This estimate (7 days)10.00 – 31.00 USDT
- Taker fee
- 0.050%
- Current funding rate
- +0.0100% / interval
- Updated
- Reference
- View the official fee source
- Confirm the exchange serves your region
Free tool
Work out opening and closing fees plus funding for a perpetual futures trade, and compare Binance and OKX on the same terms.
Estimates only, not investment advice. Check platform rules and assess risk before trading.
BTC/USDT PerpetualLong10,000 USDT5×Taker7 daysSingapore
Assuming a 0.50% maintenance margin, a move of about 19.6% against a 5× position brings it close to liquidation. This is a simplified isolated-margin estimate; your exchange account shows the actual liquidation price.
Binance and OKX are calculated with the same amount, leverage and holding period; when their rates are from different times, they are not ranked.
How far price can move against you under a stated maintenance margin, without passing it off as the exchange's liquidation price.
Sources, update times and assumptions are labelled, so you can redo the calculation yourself.
Complete step three
Rates from different times — not compared
Affiliate disclosure: registration buttons contain partner links. DZPTO may earn a commission if you register, without changing the ranking or your cost.
This estimate (7 days)10.00 – 31.00 USDT
This estimate (7 days)10.00 – 31.00 USDT
The real cost of a perpetual trade is not one fee percentage. Calculate opening and closing fees from the position notional, then add every funding payment during the holding period. For a conservative budget, reserve separately for spread and slippage. Leverage changes required margin, but it does not proportionally shrink fees charged on notional value.
Before comparing, hold constant the exchange, product, market, position notional, actual maker or taker execution, holding time, and side. Binance and OKX can apply different rates by product, account tier, and execution, so a headline minimum is not enough.
This calculator separates relatively knowable opening and closing fees from variable funding cash flows. Slippage is not an exchange fee, but it can change the realized outcome and deserves its own allowance in volatile or thin markets.
For an estimate that keeps notional constant, use the simplified expression below. If price changes alter position value, recalculate opening and closing legs with their own fill quantity and price.
Both exchanges distinguish maker and taker execution, while the applicable rate can depend on account tier, regional entity, product, and pair. A limit order is not automatically a maker order: if it executes immediately, taker pricing may apply.
Contract face value, quote or margin currency, funding rate, and settlement schedule must also match. Compare the same product at the same time using values shown in each signed-in account rather than copying one exchange's defaults to the other.
Record the product and maker/taker rates shown in your Binance or OKX account, then check the contract page for the current funding rate and next settlement. Compare the calculator with the order preview; where they differ, use the signed-in exchange information.
DZPTO provides scenario estimates. Unless explicitly shown, results exclude taxes, liquidation charges, borrowing interest, temporary campaigns, and every account-level cross-margin effect.
Worked example
Assume both opening and closing fills are taker executions at 0.05%. Assume three funding intervals at +0.01% each, a long position, and constant 10,000 USDT notional. These are replaceable inputs, not live Binance or OKX quotes.
With slippage excluded, estimated cost is 13 USDT, or 0.13% of notional. Replace any input with the value from the signed-in Binance or OKX account to reproduce that exchange's scenario. Five-times versus ten-times leverage does not change the base fees on the same 10,000 USDT notional.
They should generally be calculated from executed contract notional and the applicable rate, not only the margin posted. Verify the formula and fill details for the specific contract.
No. The execution must add liquidity to the book. A marketable limit order that fills immediately may be charged as a taker.
The example demonstrates the arithmetic only. Account tier, regional entity, product, pair, and promotions can change the rate; replace it with the signed-in value.
Count the actual settlement timestamps crossed while the position remains open. Check the contract page rather than inferring the count from days alone.
Not unless the input explicitly includes it. Volatility, order size, and market depth can make realized execution cost higher or lower.
Evidence
Each formula and exchange rule links to the official documentation, so you can check it yourself.
How this page was produced: Drafted with AI assistance · worked examples and links checked automatically before publishingLast updated